History is rarely black and white, and few historical figures are as controversial as La Malinche. Depending on who you ask, she is seen as a traitor, a victim, a survivor, or even the mother of modern Mexico. But who was she really, and why does her name still spark debate centuries later?
Who Was La Malinche?
La Malinche, also known as Malintzin or Doña Marina, was a Nahua woman born in the early 1500s in what is now Mexico. She spoke Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs, but was later sold into slavery by rival indigenous groups and ended up among the Maya, where she learned their language as well.
Her fate changed drastically in 1519, when the Spanish, led by Hernán Cortés, arrived in Mexico. The indigenous groups in the region gifted the Spaniards 20 enslaved women, one of whom was Malinche. What set her apart? She was intelligent, multilingual, and quick to adapt—qualities that made her invaluable to Cortés.
The Role of La Malinche in the Conquest
At first, communication between the Spaniards and the indigenous peoples was difficult. Cortés relied on Jerónimo de Aguilar, a Spanish castaway who had learned Maya, but Aguilar didn’t speak Nahuatl, the language of the powerful Aztec Empire.
This is where La Malinche became crucial. She spoke both Nahuatl and Maya, so she was able to interpret between the Spaniards and the indigenous peoples. Soon, she also learned Spanish, making her the main translator and advisor to Cortés.
But Malinche was more than just an interpreter. She helped Cortés understand indigenous politics, navigate alliances, and negotiate with local leaders. With her help, the Spaniards formed alliances with tribes who were enemies of the Aztecs, such as the Tlaxcalans. These alliances were key in the eventual fall of Tenochtitlán in 1521.
Was La Malinche a Traitor?
For many, La Malinche’s role in the conquest makes her a symbol of betrayal. She helped Cortés defeat Moctezuma II and dismantle the Aztec Empire, leading to centuries of Spanish rule. Because of this, in Mexican culture, the term "malinchista" is used to describe someone who favors foreign interests over their own people.
But was she really a traitor?
1️⃣ She had no loyalty to the Aztecs – The Aztecs were not a united people; they ruled over other indigenous groups with force. Many indigenous nations saw the Spanish as an opportunity to free themselves from Aztec domination.
2️⃣ She was a survivor – As a woman sold into slavery, Malinche had no power over her fate. She did what she needed to stay alive and rise in status, which was common for women in her position.
3️⃣ She shaped history – Without Malinche, the Spanish conquest would have been much harder. But without the thousands of indigenous warriors who fought alongside the Spanish, the Aztecs would not have fallen either.
La Malinche and the Birth of a New Mexico
Malinche later had a son with Hernán Cortés, named Martín Cortés, considered one of the first mestizos—a mix of indigenous and Spanish ancestry. Because of this, some see her as the mother of Mexico, representing the birth of a new, blended culture.
A Complex Legacy
La Malinche’s story is not a simple one. She was a woman in a time of war, navigating a world where survival depended on alliances and adaptation. Was she a traitor, a victim, a strategic advisor, or all of the above?
Her legacy continues to evolve. Today, many historians and feminists argue that she should be seen as a survivor and a key figure in the creation of modern Mexico, rather than just a symbol of betrayal.
What do you think? Was La Malinche a traitor, a survivor, or something more? Let us know in the comments!
📩 Want to learn more about Mexican history and culture? Join our Spanish courses and discover the true Mexico!
Comments